Like many who got their start in digital RPGs, I was surprised to discover the Spell Slot system in D&D when I first started playing. It is a pretty weird one, even if you figure it out pretty quickly.
I believe in early editions, "preparing" spells meant that you literally chose how many of each of your known spells you would have ready for the day - having three (numbers chosen arbitrarily) Fireballs ready might mean that you couldn't cast Fear (also not sure those spells were around then, though both feel likely to be very long-established ones).
Anyway, the gradual attrition in D&D is great for a survival-horror challenge like an old-school dungeon, but as the folks at MCDM (mainly Matt Colville, though I think he was acting as mouthpiece for his company) pointed out, the more heroic fantasy that D&D tends to lean toward in this day and age favors a build to a big climax.
Draw Steel's resource system is built both to make individual fights ramp up in intensity (as players start off with little of their heroic resources and need to work up to their more epic moves, as well as how the Director gains Malice to build up to their monsters' own big moves) and also encourages the players to push forward because of the way that Victories give them a head-start in resource generation so that fights toward the end of an adventure go to 11 earlier (Directors also get a head-start on Malice the more victories a party has, so it's mirrored).
But I was thinking about how resources in Deathblow, my concept for this Gothic Monster-Hunting RPG, ought to work.
Elements of both D&D and Draw Steel work their way in - I like the "every attack hits" aspect of Draw Steel, but I also think it really plays into the major distinction between losing stamina and actually getting slain by a Deathblow. Because the monsters are all very deadly, I think the narrative of "taking damage" is really more like "avoiding a lethal blow at the cost of some of your energy to continue the fight."
I certainly have some ideas about how surviving a Deathblow might still have certain impacts (like lasting injuries). But that's not the current think I'm considering:
Thematically, does a game about monster-hunting - an element of classic fantasy RPGs to be sure, but we're really zeroing in on the idea of building to a big climactic fight at the end of a hunt - feel more attrition-focused or something where resources build up to be spent?
I think the problem with traditional attrition is that, ideally, an adventure in Deathblow only has one big encounter, and zero to like, three at the most encounters against less powerful monsters (here, we want an opportunity for monsters that are more threatening in numbers, like zombies. While I'm imagining a Ghoul as a truly deadly threat on its own, zombies provide us with the more minor challenge, though the difficulty vibe I'd go for is more like RE2 Remake's spongey, serious threat zombies and not something to be mowed down in the dozens).
Anyway, given that I want this to be a game where it's perfectly reasonable (and fun) to have a multi-session adventure that has just a single combat encounter, the attrition one tends to endure over the course of many fights in a game like D&D doesn't really make sense.
I'm tempted, then, to go for something more like Draw Steel's system of heroic resources. But this also might not be the right fit: after all, Draw Steel is about charging forward from action set-piece to action set-piece, where recovering Stamina is just a matter of catching your breath and taking a moment (unless you've exhausted all your recoveries and really need to retreat to a safe location and take some serious time off). Deathblow isn't about racking up several small victories over the course of an adventure - it's about getting that one definitive victory at the end.
In writing this, I have come up with one possible option:
Tracking and identifying the monster in Deathblow will probably (everything I say about the game is tentative, and I'm not making any promises about whether this game ever gets finished, much less distributed to the public) be a core mechanical element of the game. While an adventure like this in D&D might involve some loosely-structured Survival, Investigation, maybe a knowledge skill check or two to discover what monster is threatening things, based largely on narrative, I would want to have this phase of the adventure, The Hunt, to be a really core and important part of the game, in which every class has relevant abilities to bring into play (and here, I'm using the Draw Steel meaning of Abilities, as in specific, mechanically-defined actions that your character can take, sort of like spells in D&D).
The point of The Hunt in a monster-hunting narrative is to prepare yourself for the eventual encounter with the monster. In Dracula (and surely that's a classic Gothic monster-hunting story,) Van Helsing and the other vampire-hunters spend the entire book trying to figure out just what exactly Dracula is (it's actually a bit awkward because Van Helsing seems to know but kind of draws it out to the extent that he even fails to prevent Lucy Westenra from getting turned by the Count) and the final confrontation, as Dracula flees England and tries to return to his castle, is a mad rush in the snow to take him out before the sun sets. (The Texan cowboy - and yes, there's a Texan cowboy in Dracula - doesn't make it).
Anyway, I had this idea: if the whole point of The Hunt is to prepare the party for their eventual confrontation with the monster... what if that's how they generate the resources that they use in the fight against the monster?
Let's say that you're a Mechanist, and you have a resource called Ingenuity. You spend Ingenuity on your powerful abilities (in the Mechanist's case, probably individual devices and contraptions you've created).
We'll say you're hunting, oh, a Hexen (kind of this game's equivalent of a Hag, but with a more tree-like appearance, blurring the line between hideous nightmarish humanoid and plant-life) and you use one of your Hunt abilities - let's say Residue Analysis (or maybe Residue Detector). If you do find some Bloodmoss in the washbasin of the ailing town priest, you move toward being able to identify the monster, maybe toward tracking it, and maybe you gain an Ingenuity.
Now, two things to keep in mind:
First, I think that there needs to be a fail state here. If you don't get the clue, you don't get the point of Ingenuity. Players should try to really focus on efficiently and effectively Hunting the monster, and reap the reward of more resources if they do (or, from another perspective, pay the price if they don't).
Second, there's the question of player overlap. If the Mechanist uses their Residue Detector while the Witch wants to use, oh, say, "Ken of Thorn and Blood," a spell that might animate trace amounts of poisons to bring attention to themselves, who gets the resource? Maybe the entire party gets a point of their resource for each clue they uncover - this is probably the most elegant solution.
Alternatively, different kinds of clues might empower classes differently. Maybe the Mechanist actually doesn't benefit from this particular piece of information, but by discovering it for the party as a whole, the group's Witch and Assassin both gain a point in their resource.
Here, perhaps, stat blocks could help build adventures (something I generally think is wise). We might say that different monsters will have a quota of different kinds of clues that you'll need to seed into the adventure's setting.
Let's imagine some clue categories: maybe witness accounts (including repressed memories that might need to be brought out with various abilities,) victim remains (which could be literal physical remains or maybe evidence of strange behavior) and then Signs of the Beast (which would be things like tracks, claws, teeth, other things that the monster has left behind). I really like Signs of the Beast, and I think we should come up with interesting names for the other two.
So, if you have a Vampire, say (probably a high-level monster - though I love the idea of a False Vampire that is actually some kind of Lovecraftian monstrosity that is commonly mistaken for a vampire but also actually a bit lower-level) they'll have some quota of clues for you to leave for your players. And then, each class probably generates resources on two but not all three of the clue categories.
I'm tempted to thus say that, to keep the pressure on, the party basically has limited attempts at finding these clues before they are attacked, and thus might not have all the resources they want. That said, being ambushed by the monster feels... slightly counter to the whole premise of the game. At the very least, I don't think every monster should ambush the party.
But I think if there's a failure state on investigating clues, that creates pressure to figure them all out correctly and thus have all the resources you can get for the eventual fight.
The Escape mechanic, where a failed Deathblow allows the monster to escape, adds additional tracking time. In my initial conceptualization, the price paid here is the need to keep Hunting the prey, and maybe doing so with diminished resources (the Monster is also diminished). But I think if we used something like this, it would also create this new scenario where the party has an opportunity to recoup some of the resources they expended in the failed attempt to slay the monster.
Truly, I do really like the idea of generating resources over the course of The Hunt to then use in the big fight. But it's a system that has some kinks to work out.
(Also, what do we think of Deathblow? It's a core mechanic of the game, but is it not Gothic enough? I could potentially imagine that if the system is fun enough, maybe tweaks to it could make it work in other speculative fiction genres, at the very least other kinds of monster-hunting. Maybe they're all Deathblow, but this would be "Deathblow: Night Hunters" and other versions could have a different subtitle. Anyway, I think Deathblow is the working title unless something more fitting comes about.)
No comments:
Post a Comment